1-removebg-preview

GVP Pharmacovigilance Audits & Due Diligence for MAHs, Sponsors and CROs

GVP Pharmacovigilance Audits & Due Diligence | Vendor Qualification & PV QMS | GPLACO SOLUTIONS

GVP Pharmacovigilance Audits & Due Diligence for MAHs, Sponsors and CROs

Why Vendor Qualification, PV QMS, and Pre-Outsourcing Readiness Decide Regulatory Outcomes

Who this is for:

  • A Marketing Authorisation Holder (MAH)

  • A Sponsor outsourcing pharmacovigilance

  • A Biotech scaling globally

  • Preparing for FDA, EMA, MHRA, TGA inspections

👉 Engage GPLACO SOLUTIONS for risk-based GVP audits and PV due diligence that regulators appreciate.


Why GVP Pharmacovigilance Audits Are No Longer Optional

Regulators no longer ask whether you outsourced pharmacovigilance.
They ask:

  • How did you qualify the vendor?

  • How do you control them?

  • Can you prove ongoing oversight?

Under:

👉 The MAH remains fully accountable, even if 100% of PV is outsourced.

This is where GVP audits and due diligence become business-critical.


Vendor Qualification: The #1 Failure Point in PV Inspections

Most critical inspection findings stem from poor vendor qualification, not poor vendors.

Regulators expect evidence of:

  • Risk-based vendor selection

  • Documented qualification audits

  • Defined PV responsibilities

  • Ongoing performance monitoring

Common regulatory findings:

  • “Vendor audit not performed prior to outsourcing”

  • “No documented vendor qualification rationale”

  • “Inadequate oversight of third-party PV activities”


How to Choose the Right Pharmacovigilance Vendor (Regulatory View)

Forget marketing brochures. Regulators look for proof, not promises.

Key vendor qualification criteria:

  • Proven experience with US FDA / EMA / MHRA

  • Clear understanding of GVP Modules

  • Robust PV QMS

  • Inspection history and CAPA maturity

  • Scalable operations across regions (EU, US, APAC)

Critical question regulators silently ask:

“Would this vendor survive an inspection without the MAH stepping in?”

If the answer is no — you carry the risk.


GVP Audits: What Authorities Expect to See

Types of PV audits regulators expect:

  • Vendor qualification audits

  • Routine oversight audits

  • For-cause audits

  • Pre-inspection readiness audits

Audit scope must cover:

  • ICSR intake, triage, processing, and submissions

  • Signal detection & management

  • Risk Management Plans (RMPs)

  • Aggregate reporting (PSUR / PBRER / DSUR)

  • Data integrity & compliance controls

A checkbox audit fails. Risk-based audits pass.


Establishing a Robust PV QMS (Local & Global)

A PV QMS is not documentation — it is governance.

Regulators expect:

  • Clear SOP hierarchy (Global → Regional → Local)

  • Defined MAH vs Vendor responsibilities

  • Escalation pathways

  • Deviation & CAPA management

  • Inspection readiness built into daily operations

For global organizations:

  • Local QMS must align with global standards

  • Country-specific deviations must be justified

  • Vendor SOPs must map to MAH SOPs

👉 If SOPs exist only “for audit”, inspectors will find it.


Before Outsourcing PV: Regulatory Due Diligence Checklist

This is where most organizations fail before outsourcing.

Pre-outsourcing PV checklist (inspection-ready):

Governance

  • Defined MAH accountability

  • PV System Master File (PSMF) impact assessment

  • Qualified Person for Pharmacovigilance (QPPV) alignment

Vendor Readiness

  • Completed qualification audit

  • Risk classification of vendor activities

  • Inspection history review

Contracts & Agreements

  • PV Agreement aligned with GVP Module I

  • Clear safety data exchange timelines

  • Escalation & breach management clauses

Operational Controls

  • Oversight KPIs and metrics

  • Quality review mechanisms

  • Business continuity & disaster recovery

Documentation

  • Audit reports and CAPAs

  • SOP mappings

  • Training records

If this checklist is incomplete, do not outsource yet.


Due Diligence for M&A, Licensing, and Asset Acquisition

PV due diligence is now a deal-breaker.

Regulators and investors assess:

  • Historical compliance risks

  • Open CAPAs and unresolved findings

  • Vendor dependency risks

  • Inspection exposure post-acquisition

A weak PV system can:

  • Delay deal closure

  • Reduce asset valuation

  • Trigger post-approval commitments


Why Organizations Engage GPLACO SOLUTIONS

At GPLACO SOLUTIONS, we do not sell templates — we build inspection-proof systems.

Our GVP audit & due diligence expertise includes:

  • 200+ global PV & GVP audits delivered

  • MAH, vendor, and partner audits

  • FDA, EMA, MHRA, TGA aligned frameworks

  • Risk-based vendor qualification models

  • PV QMS design for global and APAC operations

Outcome:
âś” Zero critical findings
âś” Regulatory-defensible oversight
âś” Confident outsourcing decisions


When Should You Act?

You need GVP audit & due diligence support if:

  • You are outsourcing PV

  • You manage multiple vendors

  • You are preparing for inspection

  • You are entering new markets

  • You are undergoing M&A or licensing

Waiting until inspection notice is already too late.

👉 Engage GPLACO SOLUTIONS for risk-based GVP audits and PV due diligence that regulators respect.

Share this post!